1987 Mercury Grand Marquis vs. 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mercury Grand Marquis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mercury Grand Marquis would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1987 Mercury Grand Marquis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (187 HP) has 39 more horse power than 1987 Mercury Grand Marquis. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1987 Mercury Grand Marquis.
Because 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Mercury Grand Marquis. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Mercury Grand Marquis (366 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (320 Nm). This means 1987 Mercury Grand Marquis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Mercury Grand Marquis | 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Mercury | Jeep |
Model | Grand Marquis | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1987 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 366 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 80 L |