1987 Mercury Sable vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Mercury Sable | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Mercury | Mazda |
Model | Sable | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2513 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3010 mm |