1987 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo V50 (207 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo V50 weights approximately 502 kg more than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo V50 (330 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt. (108 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Mitsubishi Colt | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | Colt | V50 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 330 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 1438 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2670 mm |