1987 Nissan Laurel vs. 2010 Kia Forte
To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Laurel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Laurel would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1987 Nissan Laurel is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1987 Nissan Laurel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Nissan Laurel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Kia Forte, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Nissan Laurel | 2010 Kia Forte | |
Make | Nissan | Kia |
Model | Laurel | Forte |
Year Released | 1987 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4481 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2649 mm |