1987 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 1987 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2.5 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (150 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2.5 should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1968 Triumph 2.5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Triumph 2.5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (222 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 1968 Triumph 2.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Nissan Pulsar | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
Make | Nissan | Triumph |
Model | Pulsar | 2.5 |
Year Released | 1987 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 150 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 222 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75.9 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70.1 mm | 95 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |