1987 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1974 Volvo 164
To start off, 1987 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1974 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Volvo 164 (142 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1974 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Volvo 164 (222 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 1974 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Nissan Pulsar | 1974 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Pulsar | 164 |
Year Released | 1987 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 2978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 142 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 222 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75.9 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70.1 mm | 80 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2730 mm |