1987 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1997 Rover 200
To start off, 1997 Rover 200 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Rover 200 (102 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Rover 200 (128 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 1997 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Nissan Pulsar | 1997 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Nissan | Rover |
| Model | Pulsar | 200 |
| Year Released | 1987 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1396 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 102 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2510 mm |
