1987 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2003 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2003 Honda CR-V is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Honda CR-V (160 HP) has 100 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 2003 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Honda CR-V (218 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 2003 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Nissan Pulsar | 2003 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Nissan | Honda |
Model | Pulsar | CR-V |
Year Released | 1987 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 160 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 218 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75.9 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70.1 mm | 99 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2630 mm |