1987 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2004 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2004 Smart ForFour is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,332 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Smart ForFour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Smart ForFour (94 HP) has 34 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Smart ForFour (125 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 2004 Smart ForFour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Nissan Pulsar | 2004 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Nissan | Smart |
| Model | Pulsar | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1332 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 94 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 125 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2510 mm |
