1987 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2006 Ascari KZ1
To start off, 2006 Ascari KZ1 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ascari KZ1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ascari KZ1 (500 HP) has 440 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ascari KZ1 should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 2006 Ascari KZ1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ascari KZ1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ascari KZ1 (550 Nm) has 448 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 2006 Ascari KZ1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Nissan Pulsar | 2006 Ascari KZ1 | |
Make | Nissan | Ascari |
Model | Pulsar | KZ1 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 4941 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 500 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 550 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75.9 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70.1 mm | 89 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1138 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2636 mm |