1987 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (143 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 2010 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ranger (209 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 2010 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Nissan Pulsar | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Pulsar | Ranger |
Year Released | 1987 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 143 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 209 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 5171 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1763 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3193 mm |