1987 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2010 Mercedes-Benz E

To start off, 2010 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mercedes-Benz E (518 HP) has 458 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.

Because 2010 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mercedes-Benz E (630 Nm) has 528 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 2010 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. 2010 Mercedes-Benz E has automatic transmission and 1987 Nissan Pulsar has manual transmission. 1987 Nissan Pulsar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mercedes-Benz E will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: