1987 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Honda CR-Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda CR-Z (120 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Honda CR-Z (174 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 2013 Honda CR-Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Nissan Pulsar | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Nissan | Honda |
| Model | Pulsar | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.9 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 70.1 mm | 89 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2435 mm |
