1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1965 Riley One-Point-Five
To start off, 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley One-Point-Five. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley One-Point-Five would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 385 kg more than 1965 Riley One-Point-Five.
Because 1965 Riley One-Point-Five is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Riley One-Point-Five. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1965 Riley One-Point-Five | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Riley |
Model | Cutlass | One-Point-Five |
Year Released | 1987 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2259 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2190 mm |