1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1979 Zastava 132
To start off, 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,259 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 225 kg more than 1979 Zastava 132.
Because 1979 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1979 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Zastava |
Model | Cutlass | 132 |
Year Released | 1987 | 1979 |
Engine Size | 2259 cc | 1754 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2560 mm |