1987 Plymouth Sundance vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 1987 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 260 (146 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1987 Plymouth Sundance. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1987 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1987 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Plymouth Sundance | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Plymouth | Volvo |
Model | Sundance | 260 |
Year Released | 1987 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2660 mm |