1987 Plymouth Sundance vs. 2010 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2010 Smart ForTwo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Plymouth Sundance (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2010 Smart ForTwo. (70 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 2010 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 355 kg more than 2010 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Plymouth Sundance | 2010 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Plymouth | Smart |
| Model | Sundance | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 1867 mm |
