1987 Plymouth Sundance vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Plymouth Sundance. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Plymouth Sundance would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (319 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1987 Plymouth Sundance. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1987 Plymouth Sundance. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 635 kg more than 1987 Plymouth Sundance. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Plymouth Sundance | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Plymouth | Chevrolet |
Model | Sundance | Camaro |
Year Released | 1987 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 319 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1918 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2852 mm |