1987 Skoda L vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Skoda L would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1987 Skoda L. (57 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1987 Skoda L.
Because 1987 Skoda L is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Skoda L. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Skoda L. (90 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Skoda L | 2010 Ford Ka | |
Make | Skoda | Ford |
Model | L | Ka |
Year Released | 1987 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 1221 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2450 mm |