1987 Skoda Rapid R vs. 2010 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 408 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Skoda Rapid R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Skoda Rapid R would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 408 (143 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1987 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408 should accelerate faster than 1987 Skoda Rapid R.
Because 1987 Skoda Rapid R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Skoda Rapid R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 408 (240 Nm) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Skoda Rapid R. (99 Nm). This means 2010 Peugeot 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Skoda Rapid R.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Skoda Rapid R | 2010 Peugeot 408 | |
| Make | Skoda | Peugeot |
| Model | Rapid R | 408 |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 1289 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 143 HP |
| Torque | 99 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1815 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1525 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2710 mm |
