1987 Toyota Cressida vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 2,366 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Toyota Cressida (129 HP) has 35 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1987 Toyota Cressida should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1987 Toyota Cressida is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Toyota Cressida. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Toyota Cressida | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | Cressida | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2366 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 94 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2490 mm |
