1987 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2004 Alfa Romeo 166
To start off, 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 weights approximately 515 kg more than 1987 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1987 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Alfa Romeo 166, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Toyota Lite Ace | 2004 Alfa Romeo 166 | |
| Make | Toyota | Alfa Romeo |
| Model | Lite Ace | 166 |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 1451 cc | 2387 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 172 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1420 mm |
