1987 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2009 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 4,414 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 502 kg more than 1987 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 2009 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 1987 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1987 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Toyota Lite Ace | 2009 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Lite Ace | XC90 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 1451 cc | 4414 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 311 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1602 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1790 mm |