1987 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1218 kg more than 1987 Toyota Lite Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Dodge Ram has automatic transmission and 1987 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1987 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Dodge Ram will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Toyota Lite Ace | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Toyota | Dodge |
| Model | Lite Ace | Ram |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1451 cc | 4700 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 310 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2318 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5817 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1908 mm |
