1987 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1987 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1987 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Toyota Lite Ace | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | Lite Ace | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1451 cc | 2000 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1679 mm |
