1987 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford C-Max weights approximately 450 kg more than 1987 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1987 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford C-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Toyota Lite Ace | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Toyota | Ford |
| Model | Lite Ace | C-Max |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1451 cc | 1596 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 105 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1684 mm |
