1987 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2012 Volvo S80
To start off, 2012 Volvo S80 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo S80 weights approximately 509 kg more than 1987 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1987 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Volvo S80 has automatic transmission and 1987 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1987 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Volvo S80 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Toyota Lite Ace | 2012 Volvo S80 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | Lite Ace | S80 |
Year Released | 1987 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1451 cc | 1600 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 180 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1609 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1864 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1483 mm |