1987 Toyota Lite Ace vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia RIO is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 4 kg more than 2013 Kia RIO.
Because 1987 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1987 Toyota Lite Ace | 2013 Kia RIO | |
| Make | Toyota | Kia |
| Model | Lite Ace | RIO |
| Year Released | 1987 | 2013 |
| Engine Size | 1451 cc | 1600 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 136 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1096 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4045 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1455 mm |
