1987 Volkswagen Polo vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1987 Volkswagen Polo. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1987 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Volkswagen Polo. (95 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Volkswagen Polo. 2012 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1987 Volkswagen Polo has manual transmission. 1987 Volkswagen Polo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Volkswagen Polo | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Volkswagen | Honda |
Model | Polo | CR-V |
Year Released | 1987 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1043 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 95 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3660 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2619 mm |