1987 Zastava Yugo vs. 2010 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Zastava Yugo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Zastava Yugo would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Epica (148 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1987 Zastava Yugo. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1987 Zastava Yugo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Epica (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Zastava Yugo. (98 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Zastava Yugo.
Compare all specifications:
1987 Zastava Yugo | 2010 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Zastava | Chevrolet |
Model | Yugo | Epica |
Year Released | 1987 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1290 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 98 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 55.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.1:1 | 17.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 65 L |