1988 Alfa Romeo Sprint vs. 1962 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 1988 Alfa Romeo Sprint is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1217 kg more than 1988 Alfa Romeo Sprint.
Because 1962 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Alfa Romeo Sprint, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 434 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Alfa Romeo Sprint. (148 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Alfa Romeo Sprint.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 Alfa Romeo Sprint | 1962 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | Sprint | Sixty |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1712 cc | 6388 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 582 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 918 kg | 2135 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 75 L |
