1988 Audi 80 vs. 2007 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2007 Cadillac CTS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,801 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1988 Audi 80. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1988 Audi 80.
Because 2007 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Audi 80. (120 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2007 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Audi 80 | 2007 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 80 | CTS |
Year Released | 1988 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 2801 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 120 Nm | 263 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2890 mm |