1988 Audi 90 vs. 2006 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2006 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Audi 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Audi 90 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Hardbody (123 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1988 Audi 90. (114 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1988 Audi 90.
Because 2006 Nissan Hardbody is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Nissan Hardbody. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Audi 90, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Hardbody (174 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Audi 90. (172 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Audi 90.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Audi 90 | 2006 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 90 | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1988 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2960 mm |