1988 Austin Maestro vs. 2000 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2000 Smart ForFour is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Smart ForFour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Smart ForFour (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1988 Austin Maestro. (66 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1988 Austin Maestro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Smart ForFour weights approximately 60 kg more than 1988 Austin Maestro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Austin Maestro | 2000 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Austin | Smart |
Model | Maestro | ForFour |
Year Released | 1988 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1275 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 47 L |