1988 BMW 316 vs. 2000 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 BMW 316 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (190 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1988 BMW 316. (86 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1988 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 BMW 316 weights approximately 450 kg more than 2000 Ford Mustang.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Mustang (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 BMW 316. (127 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2000 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 BMW 316.

Compare all specifications:

1988 BMW 316 2000 Ford Mustang
Make BMW Ford
Model 316 Mustang
Year Released 1988 2000
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1596 cc 3791 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 86 HP 190 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 127 Nm 298 Nm
Torque RPM 3900 RPM 2750 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 96.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 72 mm 86.4 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1840 kg 1390 kg
Vehicle Length 4220 mm 4660 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2580 mm