1988 BMW 320 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,190 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 BMW 320 (150 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1988 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier.
Because 1988 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 BMW 320 | 2000 Chevrolet Cavalier | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 320 | Cavalier |
| Year Released | 1988 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2190 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 120 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
