1988 BMW 320 vs. 2008 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Epica (154 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1988 BMW 320. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1988 BMW 320.
Because 1988 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Chevrolet Epica has automatic transmission and 1988 BMW 320 has manual transmission. 1988 BMW 320 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Chevrolet Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1988 BMW 320 | 2008 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 320 | Epica |
Year Released | 1988 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 154 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1460 mm |