1988 BMW 320 vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 BMW 320 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (153 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1988 BMW 320. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1988 BMW 320.
Because 1988 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1988 BMW 320 has manual transmission. 1988 BMW 320 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1988 BMW 320 | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 320 | 6 |
Year Released | 1988 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |