1988 BMW 320 vs. 2012 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2012 Jeep Compass is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Compass (158 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1988 BMW 320. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1988 BMW 320.
Because 1988 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Compass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 BMW 320 | 2012 Jeep Compass | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 320 | Compass |
Year Released | 1988 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 158 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4448 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1814 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1651 mm |