1988 BMW 520 vs. 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser

To start off, 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 BMW 520. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 BMW 520 would be higher. At 3,956 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser (239 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1988 BMW 520. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1988 BMW 520. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 BMW 520 weights approximately 496 kg more than 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser (377 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 BMW 520. (174 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 BMW 520.

Compare all specifications:

1988 BMW 520 2009 Toyota FJ Cruiser
Make BMW Toyota
Model 520 FJ Cruiser
Year Released 1988 2009
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1989 cc 3956 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 129 HP 239 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 174 Nm 377 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3700 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.8:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1570 kg 1074 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4680 mm
Vehicle Width 1810 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1820 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Consumption 7.8 L/100km 11.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.5 L/100km 14 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.9 L/100km 13.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 72 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]