1988 BMW 524 vs. 1963 Cadillac Sixty

To start off, 1988 BMW 524 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1988 BMW 524. (113 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1988 BMW 524. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 770 kg more than 1988 BMW 524. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac Sixty (582 Nm) has 372 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 BMW 524. (210 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac Sixty will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 BMW 524.

Compare all specifications:

1988 BMW 524 1963 Cadillac Sixty
Make BMW Cadillac
Model 524 Sixty
Year Released 1988 1963
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2493 cc 6390 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 113 HP 197 HP
Engine RPM 4800 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 210 Nm 582 Nm
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 101.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81 mm 98.4 mm
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1355 kg 2125 kg
Vehicle Length 4730 mm 5670 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 3300 mm