1988 BMW 524 vs. 1970 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1988 BMW 524 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,493 cc (6 cylinders), 1988 BMW 524 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1988 BMW 524. (113 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1988 BMW 524. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 BMW 524 weights approximately 395 kg more than 1970 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 BMW 524 (210 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1988 BMW 524 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1988 BMW 524 | 1970 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 524 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1988 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2493 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 22.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1355 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2480 mm |