1988 BMW 525 vs. 1982 Daihatsu Taft
To start off, 1988 BMW 525 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 2,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Daihatsu Taft is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 BMW 525 (165 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 BMW 525 should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 BMW 525 weights approximately 245 kg more than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1988 BMW 525. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 BMW 525 (239 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (165 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1988 BMW 525 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
1988 BMW 525 | 1982 Daihatsu Taft | |
Make | BMW | Daihatsu |
Model | 525 | Taft |
Year Released | 1988 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 2764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 239 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4300 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2030 mm |