1988 BMW 535 vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 BMW 535. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 BMW 535 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 1988 BMW 535. (211 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1988 BMW 535.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 BMW 535 (305 Nm) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 1988 BMW 535 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460. 1988 BMW 535 has automatic transmission and 2000 Ford ST 460 has manual transmission. 2000 Ford ST 460 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1988 BMW 535 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1988 BMW 535 | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 535 | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1988 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3430 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2580 mm |