1988 BMW M3 vs. 1949 Holden FX
To start off, 1988 BMW M3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Holden FX would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 BMW M3 (192 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1949 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1988 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1949 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 BMW M3 weights approximately 324 kg more than 1949 Holden FX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 BMW M3 (230 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Holden FX. (136 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1988 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1988 BMW M3 | 1949 Holden FX | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | M3 | FX |
| Year Released | 1988 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2302 cc | 2166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 192 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 972 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2620 mm |
