1988 BMW M3 vs. 1982 Zastava 750
To start off, 1988 BMW M3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 BMW M3 (192 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 BMW M3 weights approximately 656 kg more than 1982 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 BMW M3 (230 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1988 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
1988 BMW M3 | 1982 Zastava 750 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | M3 | 750 |
Year Released | 1988 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 2302 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 55 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2010 mm |