1988 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 BMW M3 (192 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (189 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 BMW M3 weights approximately 177 kg more than 2000 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1988 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 BMW M3 (230 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota Celica. (180 Nm @ 6800 RPM). This means 1988 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1988 BMW M3 | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | M3 | Celica |
Year Released | 1988 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2302 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 192 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.4 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1119 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 55 L |