1988 BMW M3 vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,303 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 BMW M3 (221 HP) has 151 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1988 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 BMW M3 weights approximately 460 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 BMW M3 (245 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1988 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1988 BMW M3 | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | BMW | MCC |
Model | M3 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1988 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 2303 cc | 598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 221 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 245 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 1810 mm |