1988 BMW M5 vs. 2004 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2004 Jaguar XJ is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 BMW M5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 BMW M5 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 BMW M5 (311 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2004 Jaguar XJ. (295 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 BMW M5 should accelerate faster than 2004 Jaguar XJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 BMW M5 weights approximately 8 kg more than 2004 Jaguar XJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 BMW M5. (360 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 BMW M5. 2004 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1988 BMW M5 has manual transmission. 1988 BMW M5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1988 BMW M5 2004 Jaguar XJ
Make BMW Jaguar
Model M5 XJ
Year Released 1988 2004
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3533 cc 4195 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 311 HP 295 HP
Engine RPM 6900 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 360 Nm 411 Nm
Engine Bore Size 93.4 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 11.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1733 kg 1725 kg
Vehicle Length 4730 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1870 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 3170 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.4 L/100km 8.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 18.1 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 9 L/100km 10.7 L/100km


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]