1988 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1951 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1988 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1951 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1988 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1951 Triumph Mayflower. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 130 kg more than 1951 Triumph Mayflower. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Triumph Mayflower is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Triumph Mayflower. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1988 Buick Skyhawk | 1951 Triumph Mayflower | |
Make | Buick | Triumph |
Model | Skyhawk | Mayflower |
Year Released | 1988 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2110 mm |